Posts Tagged Hillary Clinton

Clinton as Secretary of State? I love it.

Look, I was never a Clinton (for president this year) supporter.  And I came to hate the way she and Bill muddied up the water in the primary.  I felt they wouldn’t acknowledge where the mood was and that the mood called for Barack Obama.  But I have to say, it works.

It really works, it is exactly what we (the anxious transition watchers) were looking for.  I’ve come across few people in Washington who have been feeling absolutely one candidate fits the bill.  John Kerry, very accomplished, endorsed Obama at a crucial time.  Bill Richardson, also very accomplished, endorsed Obama at another helpful moment, and is rumored to have a lot of ugly skeletons in his closet.  Chuck Hagel, fun to interview for the press, very accomplished, principled, tough and would cross from the right and meet Obama in the middle, usefully.  But it still just doesn’t fit perfectly.

Clinton brings bravado, finally in a very good way, starpower (it can intimidate, and awe), a symbolic political healing, especially with white women, and the satisfaction of the so-called Pumas, those stubborn women who felt violated and would not yield to the party’s choice.  And she also brings an incisive studiousness, a seriousness and capacity (so they say) to absorb and learn incredibly quickly.  And she’s poised, ready (youbetcha!) on day one, and it bears repeating, tough.  She’d be a great Secretary of State.  

And as I just heard Pat Buchanan envisage, with the challenges on the table in 2009, nobel peace prize could be in her grasp if she shows the extraordinary leadership she might possess. It’s just what she would look for if she were open to the opportunity and able to accept the loss (I think she has, if not Bill as much).  She’d also be a good liaison for President Obama to John McCain if he plays a central role in our policies in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, the Middle East, and elsewhere. The only drawback I see is that for a Clinton to be Obama’s envoy to the world, does that suggest a Clinton years redux in foreign policy.

Wait, there is one drawback, for it’s for Clinton herself.  Taking the job would take her out of political rotation for a while, as Andrea Mitchell put it on Hardball tonight, she wouldn’t be out campaigning for people, collecting chits and so on.  And, Chris Matthews rightly noted 

She’d be an asset.  And I think they both know it.  This announcement will be something to see, people.  Maybe they’ll cut to Bill wiping a tear from his eye.

Comments (1)

The Todd and Sarah Palin amateur hour

We all knew that Sarah Palin, her husband and a good many of her staff had been pressuring former police commissioner Walt Monegan, literally since she took over as governor, to fire an Alaska State Trooper, Palin’s ex-brother-in-law, Mike Wooten.  So, it really comes as no surprise that the bipartisan legislative investigation into the matter found on Friday that Palin improperly used her office to achieve satisfaction of a personal matter.

The real story here, as Nathan Thornburgh writes, is how very “amateurish” the Palin administration was, and so obviously in for a thorough public humiliation over its bullying and cronyist tactics.

The 263 pages of the report show a co-ordinated application of pressure on Monegan so transparent and ham-handed that it was almost certain to end in public embarrassment for the governor . . .

Not only did people at almost every level of the Palin administration engage in repeated inappropriate contact with Walt Monegan and other high-ranking officials at the Department of Public Safety, but Monegan and his peers constantly warned these Palin disciples that the contact was inappropriate and probably unlawful. Still, the emails and calls continued — in at least one instance on recorded state trooper phone lines.

The state’s head of personnel, Annette Kreitzer, called Monegan and had to be warned that personnel issues were confidential. The state’s attorney general, Talis Colberg, called Monegan and had to be reminded that the call was putting both men in legal jeopardy, should Wooten decide to sue. The governor’s chief of staff met with Monegan and had to be reminded by Monegan that, “This conversation is discoverable … You don’t want Wooten to own your house, do you?” 

. . . One telling exchange: Deputy Commissioner John Glass, who worked under Monegan, told Branchflower he was “livid” after a Palin staffer, Frank Bailey, went outside the chain of command and called a state trooper in far-off Ketchikan to complain about Wooten. Why had Bailey called the trooper? Because, Bailey said, this trooper had gone to church with Sarah Palin back in Wasilla, so he felt “comfortable” talking to him about Wooten. Glass, too, tried to sound the warning that continuing to pressure anyone and everyone in the matter would end in “an unbelievable amount of embarrassment for the Governor and everybody else”.

 . . . Another amateurish sign: Todd Palin’s outsize role in the mess. Branchflower said it was out of his jurisdiction to pass judgment on the First Gentleman, but his report paints an extralegal role for Todd Palin that would have made the Hillary Clinton of 1992 blush. In the report, the head of Gov. Palin’s security detail says that Todd spent about half of his time in the governor’s office — not at a desk (he didn’t have one), but at a long conference table on one side of the office, with his own phone to make and receive calls. It became a shadow office, the informal Department of Getting Mike Wooten Fired.

Shadow office.  Todd Palin’s outsize role in his wife’s administration.  Quick: what two oft-maligned pols do those characterizations make you think of?  Dick Cheney and Hillary Clinton?  

Sarah Palin should count herself lucky that she was less directly involved in the harassment of Commissioner Monegan, having outsourced the job to everyone around her instead.  But Thornburgh is right that the overwhelming and truly sophomoric intimidation campaign — started within days of her term as Governor — that Sarah Palin tolerated and encouraged is the greater indictment of her short time at the helm in Alaska.  Power in office is a privilege and a responsibility, not an advantage to be exploited to settle personal vendettas, no matter how noble the cause.  

Sarah Palin has styled herself the outsider who will clean up Washington.  In truth, she is no more suited to the task than the Washington insiders she so often bludgeons with her hypocritical Youbetchas.

Leave a Comment

Bill: Get over it, will ya?!

I know that some people have speculated that Clinton lost the ability to contain his seething temper tantrums in public after undergoing bypass surgery 4 years ago.  (Note: the link above has a quick and dirty post-mortem of Bill Clinton’s behavior in the primaries) That might explain little crazy hiccups like yelling at a reporter on the campaign trail for Hillary.  I’m not sure it explains this:

Seriously?  Has Bill Clinton never seen the clip of John McCain’s meanspirited Chelsea Clinton joke, that should, given Bill’s demonstrated ability to hold a grudge, make his blood boil even today?

And is he really A-okay with Sarah Palin calling Hillary a whiner in the primary and then turning 180 degrees to claim the torch – and to “break that glass ceiling” – that he, Bill, as in President, Clinton worked so hard to pass to his hand-picked successor, Hillary?

When Bill Clinton gets started, you never know where he’ll end up.  So, naturally his performance on Letterman the other night was just what the Democratic party ordered.  It was nothing apocalyptic, just eerie.  He mostly talked mostly about Hillary, and as little as possible about the Democratic nominee for president, Barack Obama.  “Is it me, or did he not want to say the words ‘Barack Obama?” cracked comedian Chris Rock, who followed Clinton on the show.

Paul Slansky over at the Huffington Post calls on Clinton to put aside his obvious grudge against the Democratic nominee, arguing that if it hadn’t been for Clinton’s misbehavior with a certain intern, “we would never have had the odious George W. Bush in the White House in the first place.”  So, Slansky argues, Bill Clinton owes it to all of us to work his heart out to elect Barack Obama.

We see you petulantly rooting against him even as you go through the motions of doing the barest minimum on his behalf to avoid being blamed if he loses. You’re not fooling anyone, Bill. You’ve gotten so caught up in yesterday that you’ve stopped thinking about tomorrow. You have the power to influence millions of voters and you’re spitefully sitting on it . . .

. . . If Obama loses a close election — one in which even one state where you could have made a difference goes for McCain because you sat home and pouted — it will be on you. We will remember that you couldn’t be bothered to rise above your petty resentments for something as trivial as saving your country from the enemies of everything you profess to believe in. We forgave you for Monica, Bill, but we won’t forgive you for this.

Leave a Comment

Mrs. O’Leary’s Cow: Advisor to Barack Obama

Folks, this story is a little in the weeds and now old — I managed to NOT publish it, despite writing it two days ago, when we were all shaking our heads at the “wildly exaggerating” McCain ad that called Franklin Raines (former Fannie Mae chief) an Obama advisor.

But it is still very important that you know that Sarah Palin did not withdraw from the anti-Iran rally because she is unaware of the grave threat Iran poses. Nor is it because she is intimidated by the vitriolic Ahmadenijad.  And she certainly isn’t calling for negotiations.  I am not sure where you heard those rumors, but none of them are true.  The truth is, she was just being jerked around on a string by political operators who hate freedom.

One of Sarah Palin’s advisors, a guy named Mark Wallace (husband of McCain campaign spokeswoman Nichole Wallace), is executive director of the group organizing the rally.  He thought Hillary Clinton — who signed on in August — would be fine appearing on stage with the new female phenom, and with Hillary being such a prominate Democrat, no one would miss team Obama.   So, nobody bothered to invite them, until five days before the event, when there was no Hillary to lend heft and painful irony to Palin’s appearance (because she withdrew when Sarah Palin’s addition made the event overtly political).  So, the organizers invited the Obama campaign to participate, with a full four or five days notice.

The Obama campaign signed on, sending over well-known Florida (and Jewish) Congressman Robert Wexler.  Well, at that point, the organizers decided the rally was getting too much political attention from too many “political personalities” and disinvited Palin and Wexler.  Huh?

Menacham Rosencraft at the Huffington Post explains:

Let’s be perfectly clear. The organizers had initially invited Governor Palin without ever contacting, let alone inviting, anyone from the Obama campaign. When they finally issued a belated invitation to the Obama side, it was accepted, and a prominent Democratic Member of Congress was going to speak at the rally. The organizers then disinvited both Governor Palin and Representative Wexler. And whom does the GOP hold responsible for this fiasco? Barack Obama, of course.

Never mind that the Obama campaign was ready, willing and able to participate in the rally. Never mind that neither Senator Obama nor his campaign had had anything to do with the organizers’ decisions to invite and then disinvite Governor Palin. Never mind that the McCain-Palin campaign had been perfectly content to have Governor Palin speak at the rally without anyone representing the Obama campaign. Lamenting the rally organizers’ withdrawal of the Palin invitation, the McCain campaign charged that “Senator Obama’s campaign had the opportunity to join us. Senator Obama chose politics rather than the national interest.”

If John McCain and his GOP flacks thought they could get away with it, they would blame Barack Obama for the Great Depression, the 1876 massacre at Little Big Horn, the bubonic pandemic of the 1340s, and the Great Chicago Fire of 1871. And they would probably run ads alleging that Mrs. O’Leary, whose legendary cow is alleged to have started the Chicago fire, was an Obama public safety adviser.

Leave a Comment

Hillary says no to Palin

Sarah Palin is raining on Hillary Clinton’s parade, literally.  Clinton was planning to attend a rally in protest of President Mahmoud Ahmadenijad of Iran, who will be in New York next Monday at the United Nations.  But, after learning the Sarah Palin is now expected to attend, a Clinton spokesman confirmed the former first lady will not attend the demonstration.  ”(Palin’s) attendance was news to us, and this was never billed to us as a partisan political event,” says a Clinton spokesman.

My question is, would Clinton have been attending this rally if she had won the Democratic nomination for president?  I think not.  Because no matter the distaste for Ahmadenijad, this is no time for saber-rattling from the highest offices in our land, or from those who would occupy them.  And for Sarah Palin to have insisted that the United States could not “second guess” Israel if it were to bomb Iran in an unprovoked attack is the kind of careless, breezy diplomacy that President Bush (43) has been widely criticized for, and actually chastened away from in his current approach to Iran.

Here is where knowledge of the Bush Doctrine comes in.  Ahmadenijad has said horrible things about Israel–suggesting it should be wiped off the face of the earth being the worst among them–but he has not attacked Israel, and must certainly know that if he did, the United States would retaliate swiftly.  Would we side on the sidelines if we learned Pakistan were going to launch a pre-emptive attack on India?  

I deeply believe in a Jewish state, and want to see peace between Israel, a Palestinian state and the rest of the region.  But if Israel were to attack Iran, such an attack could unleash a world of hatred and hurt against Israel (and no doubt, the United States) from terrorist enclaves and their sympathizers around the world. The goal of the next administration must be to reduce worldwide tensions, not incite them further.

I feel quite sure, however, that as much as this photo op of Veep Palin bashing Ahmadenijad, the United Nations meeting provides Palin an opportunity to force a head of state to meet with her and bolster her foreign policy credentials.  I’m guessing it’s going to be Angela Merkel (female bonding photo op), Nouri Al-Maliki (which almost counts for having been to Iraq, right?) or perhaps with Nicolas Sarkozy, an equal opportunity photo-opper out to boost the French presidency after that whole “old Europe” thing.

One wonders, while in New York, will the vice presidential nominee find time to stop by Wall Street?

Leave a Comment

I heart Tina Fey

Tina Fey and Amy Poehler leave nothing unsaid in this searing and hilarious Saturday Night Live skit from last night.  When the campaign drives you crazy, just watch this video.  (I bet Hillary Clinton will- alot.) Laughter is really the best therapy.

Leave a Comment