Posts Tagged battleground states

Here’s how to call this race before the West Coast polls close

If ever an election could give Democrats and Republicans alike a stomach ulcer, this would be it.

This election night, we could all be up waiting, pretty late, for the final call on this race.  Why?  For starters, California’s 55 electoral votes can’t be counted (or called by networks) until after their polls close- three hours after the east coast polls have closed, and, unless Obama sweeps the east coast, including Georgia, North Carolina, Florida and Ohio, he needs California to officially lock it in).  And since it isn’t terribly likely that Obama can pull off such a complete sweep, then you have three mountain west battleground states, Nevada, Colorado and New Mexico, that could all play a down-to-the-wire role for either candidate.

So, for those of you who are frustrated that by 10:00 or 11:00 pm or so, none of the networks have called the race and neither of the two major party candidates has conceded the race, but you really, really want to a) go to bed election night knowing who the next president will be, or, b) go out on the town to revel in your candidate’s impending and assured success, I think I’ve got your answer:

OBAMA WINS: If Pennsylvania and Virginia go for Barack Obama (and the pollsters aren’t wrong on New Hampshire this time), this thing is over, baby.  Over. Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, Georgia, Missouri, Indiana, Nevada, Colorado, and New Mexico can all go to McCain at whatever hour of the night or morning it takes- won’t matter.  Obama still comes out ahead.  So, your revelry or bedtime could depend on how close the vote in Pennsylvania and Virginia are, and how long it takes to count them (if it isn’t very close, network statisticians will call the state’s race, and, of course, we’re less likely to see a Florida 2000 or Ohio 2004 mess).  Does this seem too simple, too easy, to believe? You can check my math here.

McCAIN WINS: Because McCain is down in so many of the battleground state polls, in many cases by more than the margin of error, it would be very hard to definitively call the race for him early. Because if he wins Pennsylvania and Virginia, that merely shows he surprised in those states, and he will have to surprise in other states to win this thing.  Yet, such shockers could indicate a larger trend for McCain, and would give his supporters reason to stay up late to watch to the end.

I’ll make this prediction, for whatever it’s worth: You can call this thing for Barack Obama before midnight election night.

No matter who you are supporting in this election, please, GO OUT AND VOTE.

Comments (2)

The road to the White House will run through Virginia

I agree with Simon Rosenberg at the Huffington Post, who counsels election watchers not to mistake a tightening race this week for a McCain comeback.

My sense now is that McCain is likely to gain 4-5 points in this these final few weeks and return to a respectable level for a credible GOP candidate. Part of what may drive this movement in the next few weeks is McCain bouncing back up from his current below-the-floor position. I mean 43 percent for a major GOP candidate in a two-way race? No way we are going to end up there.

McCain’s gains these coming weeks will be because he had been so dramatically underperforming since his successful convention. His erratic performance in the debates, his very public confusion during that first week of the financial crisis, the cratering of Sarah Palin, have all combined to leave him several points below where he should be at this point. In these next few weeks he will in all likelihood regain ground he should have been occupying all along but lost due to his disappointing campaign. So in many ways, McCain’s likely uptick is more a sign of his current weakness than any newfound strength.

Getting back up to 46, 47, 48 is not the same as winning. My guess is there will be a lot of confusion about this in the chattering classes in the next few weeks.

Remember to factor in a couple of points for Bob Barr and perennial candidate Ralph Nader, and keep in mind that George Bush won in 2004 with just 49 percent of the popular vote.  So long as Obama’s national poll numbers hover around and above the 50% mark, he’s in a good position.

Then take into account possible factors like the cell phone vote (who are not really accounted for in most polls) and of course the fabled Bradley effect.  Some analysts have also referred to a possible reverse Bradley effect, suggesting that some people who live in communities less likely to vote for a black man may not feel comfortable expressing support for Obama in a phone interview, but might actually vote for Obama once inside the booth.  This hypothesis originates in a study done on the 2008 Democratic primary results found that Obama outperformed poll spreads by an average of 7%.

The researchers attributed the inaccuracy of the polls to social influences. For instance, Greenwald said many women told pollsters they were voting for Hillary Clinton but ultimately cast their ballots for Obama.

“I don’t think they’re lying to pollsters,” Greenwald said, explaining that pollsters are contacting people who are undecided and may feel pressure to say they’re voting for the candidate who most closely identifies with them socially. 

Greenwald said he expects to see the reverse effect in the general election, but mostly among older voters who say they’re supporting John McCain. He expects many will pull the lever for Obama based, on multiple reasons, including the financial crisis. This trend could determine the outcome of the election, Greenwald said, if Obama’s lead shrinks in some state polls. 

Races always tighten toward the end.  We are nearing the final sprint in the race, and as Rosenburg points out, McCain’s poll numbers over the last month reflect how badly he and Palin damaged their numbers. Absent further missteps, McCain could get back into the mid to upper 40’s.  But he will have to watch out for the “Why bother?” effect on his side: if he looks sure to lose in the final days, some McCain leaning voters may just stay home.

At the same time, Obama needs to make sure his supporters don’t get complacent, and he has warned as much.  Obama’s numbers will also be affected by whether his campaign has been able to get out the early vote, when voters were comforted by his calm demeanor through the financial crisis and McCain was cratering.  This year is an important test, as well, of whether the Democrats can get their new and less-likely-to-show-up voters to the polls.  For all their disadvantages this year, the Republican party is typically quite effective at turning out its vote through churches and neighbor-to-neighbor contacts.

Obviously, the election doesn’t come down to the national popular vote tallies.  In my opinion, Obama’s clearest path to the White House runs through Virginia.  If he can hold this state, it is nearly impossible for McCain to win (Obama stands at 286 electoral votes with the Virginia, New Mexico, Iowa and New Hampshire battlegrounds in his column).  The Obama campaign’s effort to court a host of red and newly purple state voters – North Carolina, Indiana, Florida, Ohio, Colorado, Nevada – is smart because it forces McCain and Palin to spend precious time in these states.  Plus, if these states do actually swing to Obama, then he’ll walk into the White House with not just a Democratic Congress but with a mandate.

Leave a Comment

Does Obama have a lock on this thing now?

With his surprisingly strong showings in Quinnipiac’s latest polls in Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania, Barack Obama’s prospects for winning this thing have never looked better.  Even if these three polls are extreme outliers (wait, Obama up by how many in Florida??), they do mirror the less dramatic shift we’ve seen in other polls in the last two weeks in not just these three states, but all of the ten most watched battlegrounds.

Obama’s uncomfortably tight mid-September leads in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Colorado, New Mexico and Pennsylvania are now in the 4 – 10 point range.  Michigan, which had been a top target for the McCain campaign is looking like safe Obama country, he’s surging in Virginia to at least a real neck-and-neck tie (new polls show a < 2 point Obama edge), and, the Quinnipiac poll shows a burst of support for Obama in Ohio, a must-win for McCain.  Incredibly, Obama’s even putting North Carolina back in play.  (New NC polling also shows incumbent GOP senator Elizabeth Dole is now in serious trouble.)  And of course, no one mentions the perennial battleground state of Iowa, because, well, it practically in the “solid” Obama column this year.

As I have previously written, Obama’s path to electoral victory is much easier than McCain’s.  So long as he keeps Michigan and Pennsylvania (and, having already pocketed Iowa), and retains Minnesota and Wisconsin, then it’s just a matter of picking a couple of the remaining 6-8 swing states.  If McCain can’t pick off any of the four states I just mentioned, he needs to pretty much sweep the remaining swing states.  And now he is behind in almost all of them (I haven’t yet mentioned Nevada, which still slightly leans McCain, or New Hampshire, which has been leaning Obama).

Andrew Romano, over at Newsweek, puts this winning streak in perspective:

Does this mean that McCain is toast? Hardly. As September has shown, support for the candidates can fluctuate wildly in response to events, and there’s still time remaining on the clock for a comeback. Obama could still lose–easily. But it’s impossible to ignore the fact that the Arizona senator now faces a steeper climb than ever before–with fewer days left for climbing.  As the New Republic’s John Judis has pointed out, “since 1960, Gallup’s [Oct. 1] tracking poll registered the winner in the popular vote (including Al Gore in 2000), eleven of twelve times.” Usually the race narrows somewhat at the end, but “in six of th[o]se elections–1960, 1964, 1976, 1984, 1988 and 2000–the final margin was different from the Oct. 1 polling results by less than three percentage points.”

Which is why Obamans should be heartened by the latest stats from Gallup: Obama 50, McCain 42. On Election Day, the Bradley Effect–overstated support for black candidates–may cost Obama two or three points at the polls. Undersampled cell-phone voters and increased black and youth turnout may boost him by the same amount–or more. But either way, the fact remains: Obama merely needs to maintain altitude between now and Nov. 4. McCain needs to bring him down.

And how.  If the election were held today, the result would be 348 (Obama) -189 (McCain).  Yesterday, the map showed 301 – 237.  And two weeks ago, when McCain was riding a really long post-convention bump, it was still at 273 – 265 (in this scenario, New Hampshire could decide the election).

One very narrow path I see to McCain pulling off an upset is through Sarah Palin.  While all the other trending Democratic battleground states get bluer (Colorado, Iowa, New Mexico, Michigan), Minnesota stubbornly remains on the fence.  Could Sarah Palin’s hockey mom vibe help McCain here?  I guess the post-Veep debate polls will tell.

Comments (1)